Difference between revisions of "Pool 2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Pool 2 farms require users to take exposure to native tokens issued by the protocol. It is a sort of “secondary pool” to incentivize farmers of Pool 1 to continue holding on to the protocol’s tokens, or to provide liquidity for these tokens, instead of selling them out. Pool 2 farms are often highly incentivized with higher APYs because these positions take more exposure to the protocol itself (via ownership of the assets native to the protocol). <ref>https://www....") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Pool 2 farms require users to take exposure to native tokens issued by the protocol. It is a sort of “secondary pool” to incentivize farmers of Pool 1 to continue holding on to the protocol’s tokens, or to provide liquidity for these tokens, instead of selling them out. Pool 2 farms are often highly incentivized with higher APYs because these positions take more exposure to the protocol itself (via ownership of the assets native to the protocol). <ref>https://www.nansen.ai/research/a-farmers-guide-to-yield</ref> | Pool 2 farms require users to take exposure to native tokens issued by the protocol. It is a sort of “secondary pool” to incentivize farmers of Pool 1 to continue holding on to the protocol’s tokens, or to provide liquidity for these tokens, instead of selling them out. Pool 2 farms are often highly incentivized with higher APYs because these positions take more exposure to the protocol itself (via ownership of the assets native to the protocol). <ref>https://www.nansen.ai/research/a-farmers-guide-to-yield</ref> | ||
== References == |
Revision as of 13:45, 25 April 2022
Pool 2 farms require users to take exposure to native tokens issued by the protocol. It is a sort of “secondary pool” to incentivize farmers of Pool 1 to continue holding on to the protocol’s tokens, or to provide liquidity for these tokens, instead of selling them out. Pool 2 farms are often highly incentivized with higher APYs because these positions take more exposure to the protocol itself (via ownership of the assets native to the protocol). [1]